Washington counsel for financial crime, national security and government enforcementEstablished 2002 · 1-202-9824-980
Senior Washington lawyers overlooking federal institutions at blue hour
Washington, D.C. · Senior-led counsel

Counsel where finance, government and national security converge.

Kevin Hall Law Firm helps institutions, boards, organizations and individuals make defensible decisions when a transaction, investigation or government action carries consequences across several legal systems at once.

Established 2002Washington practice
10 connected practicesOne coordinated record
Senior-led teamsDirect partner judgment
Practice directory

An expanded team for connected business and government risk.

The firm’s core remains financial crime, terrorism finance, sanctions and national-security enforcement. These additional practices address the disputes, transactions, data, workforce and asset questions that often arise from the same facts.

Each page below is a complete practice resource with scope, services, client groups, working method, selected capabilities and the senior lawyers responsible for the work.

Four integrated pillars

A single team across criminal, regulatory, sanctions and policy risk.

Terrorism-financing matters rarely stay in one lane. A transaction review can trigger a suspicious-activity analysis, an OFAC blocking question, a grand-jury subpoena, or inquiries from a board, correspondent bank and government agency at the same time. Our four pillars are designed to operate as one response.

01 · DEFENSE

Material Support & Investigations

Defense under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2339A and 2339B, grand-jury response, witness preparation, evidence analysis and parallel sanctions strategy.

02 · COMPLIANCE

AML/CFT Programs

Risk assessments, governance, customer and counterparty diligence, transaction monitoring, information sharing, testing and remediation.

03 · SANCTIONS

Designations & Delisting

OFAC blocking and 50 Percent Rule analysis, licensing, humanitarian pathways, administrative reconsideration and enforcement submissions.

04 · ENFORCEMENT

Government Response

DOJ, FBI, FinCEN, OFAC, congressional and cross-border engagement managed through one privileged, fact-driven strategy.

Practices

Ten capabilities dedicated to counter-terrorism finance.

We do not treat CTF as a subsection of a general white-collar practice. Every capability below is organized around financial flows, national-security authorities and the operational realities of regulated institutions and humanitarian organizations.

01

Material Support Defense

Defense involving 18 U.S.C. §§ 2339A/B, alleged services, funds, personnel, training or expert advice.

03

AML/CFT Program Design

Enterprise risk assessments, board governance, policies, controls, model validation, testing and remediation.

05

OFAC Sanctions & Licensing

Blocking, rejecting, reporting, ownership and control, general licenses and specific-license applications.

06

Designation & Delisting

Administrative reconsideration, evidentiary submissions, questionnaires and coordinated cross-border relief.

08

Crypto, Fintech & MSBs

Wallet and transaction analytics, travel-rule issues, agents, liquidity partners and escalation design.

10

Cross-Border Enforcement

MLAT requests, extradition risk, data transfer, coordinated sanctions and multi-agency investigative response.

Secure Washington law firm boardroom
Government affairs · FARA · CTF

Policy strategy that does not compromise the legal defense.

Congressional, legislative and FARA issues can become part of the same factual record examined by prosecutors, regulators and sanctions authorities.

We coordinate government-affairs work with criminal and regulatory counsel so public statements, registrations, document productions and policy advocacy remain accurate and consistent. The team evaluates whether activity for a foreign principal raises FARA questions, prepares for congressional interviews and information requests, and helps institutions explain CTF controls to policymakers without exposing privileged legal analysis.

Where pending legislation, appropriations language, sanctions authorities or humanitarian exceptions affect a lawful operation, we build a record grounded in operational facts. The goal is credible engagement, not public theater.

Government enforcement practice
Industries

Controls must fit the institution that operates them.

01

Banks

Correspondent banking, Section 311, 314(a)/(b), sanctions screening, SAR governance and remediation.

02

Fintechs

Rapid growth, sponsor-bank oversight, payment rails, cross-border products and control maturity.

03

Charities & NGOs

Donor, partner, beneficiary and humanitarian delivery controls calibrated to actual risk.

04

Crypto Exchanges

Wallet screening, blockchain analytics, Travel Rule workflows, mixers and high-risk corridors.

05

Money Services Businesses

Agent oversight, informal value transfer, remittance corridors, cash activity and state-federal coordination.

View industry counsel
Why Kevin Hall Law Firm

Senior judgment, organized for high-consequence matters.

Since 2002, the firm has operated from Washington with a partner-led model. The lawyers responsible for strategy remain close to the documents, data and decision-makers.

That structure matters in CTF work. Definitions are technical, facts cross borders, and a single internal email can be read differently by a regulator, prosecutor or sanctions authority. We establish a common chronology, preserve privilege, identify the controlling legal standards and separate provable facts from assumptions. Advice is delivered in language that boards, compliance officers, investigators and operational teams can use.

2002Firm established
2Partners
1Washington office
4Integrated pillars
Attorneys

A senior team shaped by government and institutional experience.

Our lawyers bring backgrounds in federal prosecution, DOJ counterterrorism, OFAC, FinCEN, congressional oversight and financial-institution counseling.

Portrait of Kevin Hall
Founder & Managing Partner

Kevin Hall

Terrorism Financing Defense & Investigations. Leads crisis response, material-support defense and cross-border investigative strategy. His practice is built around early command of the facts, disciplined privilege, and coordinated engagement with prosecutors, regulators and financial institutions.

View detailed profile
Portrait of Daniel R. Mercer
Partner

Daniel R. Mercer

Terror Financing & Material Support Defense. Represents organizations and individuals in investigations involving 18 U.S.C. §§ 2339A and 2339B, grand-jury process, classified-information issues, and parallel sanctions exposure.

View detailed profile
Portrait of Michael Reed
Senior Attorney

Michael Reed

CTF Compliance, Banks & Correspondent Banking. Counsels banks, MSBs and payment businesses on enterprise CTF controls, correspondent banking, Section 311 risk, sanctions screening, governance, investigations and sustainable remediation.

View detailed profile
Portrait of Robert J. Hayes
Senior Attorney

Robert J. Hayes

Government Affairs, FARA & Terror Finance. Guides clients through congressional inquiries, national-security policy, FARA analysis, appropriations and authorizing legislation, while coordinating carefully with criminal and regulatory defense teams.

View detailed profile
Portrait of Thomas E. Carter
Senior Attorney

Thomas E. Carter

National Security, Sanctions & Delisting. Advises on blocking, ownership and control, licensing, humanitarian transactions, delisting petitions, enforcement submissions, and cross-border coordination with sanctions authorities.

View detailed profile
Portrait of Jonathan K. Walsh
Senior Attorney

Jonathan K. Walsh

Crypto, Charities & CTF Controls. Designs risk-based programs for virtual assets, humanitarian activity and nonprofit operations, with emphasis on wallet analytics, donor and beneficiary diligence, information sharing and defensible escalation.

View detailed profile
Meet the attorneys
CTF insights

Practical analysis for legal and compliance leaders.

Material Support

Building the factual record before a § 2339B theory hardens

How counsel can map knowledge, services, counterparties and communications while protecting privilege and avoiding speculative internal conclusions.

Daniel R. Mercer · Kevin Hall Law Firm
Compliance

Section 314 information sharing in a fast-moving CTF review

A governance framework for responding to 314(a) requests and using 314(b) information sharing within its statutory and regulatory conditions.

Michael Reed · Kevin Hall Law Firm
Sanctions

Humanitarian activity after a terrorism-related screening alert

A disciplined process for ownership analysis, license review, documentation, escalation and outreach without unnecessarily abandoning lawful relief activity.

Thomas E. Carter · Kevin Hall Law Firm
Read all insights
A larger practice, one method

Connected advice for facts that move across forums.

A payment investigation can become a sanctions issue, cyber incident, contract dispute, workforce review, transaction problem and congressional inquiry. The firm now presents those connected capabilities as complete practices rather than hiding them behind four broad labels.

Each team works from a common chronology and documented decision structure. Specialist analysis remains precise, but clients see the dependencies early: what one agency can request, what a contract requires, what a board must decide and how a public statement may affect litigation.

How the firm works
Senior lawyers coordinating a Washington legal strategy
Expanded senior bench

More depth without losing partner attention.

Four additional senior male lawyers extend the team into complex litigation, corporate transactions, cybersecurity and international trade.

They work with the firm’s existing financial-crime, sanctions, compliance and government-affairs lawyers. Matters receive the combination of experience they need, while one senior lead remains accountable for strategy, work plan and client communication.

Bring structure to the first critical decisions.

For urgent investigations, sanctions restrictions, cyber incidents, subpoenas or cross-border enforcement, contact the Washington team. Do not send privileged, classified or sensitive financial records before an engagement is confirmed.

Request a confidential consultation